On April 9, 2000 the following letter went out to all 200-plus members
of the NYBA, the media, the Washington State Senators and Representative
and Commissioner Jennifer Belcher.
Governor Gary Locke
P.O. Box 40002
Olympia, Washington 98504
Dear Governor Locke:
As officers of the NORTHWEST YACHT BROKERS ASSOCIATION, a trade
association representing over 200 of the area's yacht brokers and dealers,
we must raise our voices in objection to the current efforts of Jennifer
Belcher and the Department of Natural Resources to prohibit liveaboard
boaters from DNR-leased slips in our state's private marinas. This assault
by DNR on liveaboard boaters is without foundation in state law, overlooks
the numerous positive benefits provided by liveaboards, threatens the
lifestyle and housing options of thousands of families, and begins to
threaten the fragile marine industry.
Liveaboards, of course, aren't prohibited by any state law. Instead,
this recent action is based on DNR's reinterpretation of the 1984 Aquatic
Land Management Act. At the time, the intent of the bill was to prohibit
development of commercial properties -such as apartments, condominiums and
hotels - from being built out over the state tidelands. Liveaboards were
never mentioned in the original legislation or its accompanying
interpretation. The reason, quite simply, was the legislation was never
intended to ban people from living aboard their boats. Only years later,
did DNR reinterpret the 1984 bill to include a prohibition on liveaboards
in a deliberate attempt to further some new, private agenda.
DNR's proclaimed purpose of evicting liveaboards to preserve public
access and recreational opportunities is disingenuous at best. A boat will
still reside in that slip, a boat will still be moored over public
property. There will be no additional public access, there are no
additional recreational opportunities. When Ms. Belcher declared, "the
state has long had a policy that you don't allow residential use on public
property" she, of course, overlooked the century-long precedent of people
living aboard their boats over the state tidelands; and she conveniently
ignored the many, many examples of private housing on public land
currently taking place in the state. Must the University of Washington and
other state public universities prohibit all on-campus housing? How about
all the housing already allowed at state parks, and other lands held in
the public trust?
One DNR representative said that living aboard a boat is no different
than a person pulling an RV into a state park and living there. Of course,
there is a big difference, one never mentioned in DNR's spin on this
policy issue. State property over the water is leased to private
businesses such as marinas for private commercial purposes. Now DNR is
placing limitations on how that private enterprise may conduct business.
Does the state have the legal authority to dictate terms and conditions on
how people use their boats? If DNR can prohibit liveaboards, can it also
decide that no one can use their boats more than three days a week or a
person can't stay on his or her boat for a month in the summer? Once the
state begins dictating terms and conditions on how people may use their
boats, where does it stop? DNR is prohibiting a business activity that has
been a vital part of boating activity in this region for over a century.
At the same time, DNR is asking for increased fees for water rights and
simultaneously prohibiting a significant segment of the way in which a
marina owner raises such fees.
And living aboard a boat is another example of the variety of lifestyle
that makes the Pacific Northwest such a great place to live. It is a
community rich in diversity, reflective of the most cherished values of
our society. In the Seattle area alone, thousands of folks from nearly
every profession permanently occupy a dizzying array of boats. Doctors,
architects and lawyers - as well as nurses, engineers, mechanics, retirees
and writers - live on large and small sailboats, and every kind of power
boat imaginable. These people are at the center of our social structure,
they make up the core of our region's economic vitality. They have just
chosen something a little different for their housing requirements. They
have decided to integrate their passion for boating more fully into a
lifestyle.
In fact, in a time of increased environmental awareness, living aboard
a boat is something that should be encouraged and promoted, not outlawed.
A liveaboard, occupying a footprint of roughly 600 square feet of space,
uses 10 percent of the water of an average household, and 20 percent of
the electricity. Liveaboards have a self-contained sewage system, and
monitor the water daily, clean up floating debris, are the first to report
oil slicks and keep a vigilant eye out for polluters. In fact, liveaboards
have long been the region's best environmental stewards of the water. They
have been proactive in providing solutions to environmental problems
caused by all boaters. Liveaboards developed and promoted the New Moon
Project, a public-service project which installed for free portable sewage
pumpout units throughout the region and were made available free to all
boaters; this nationally recognized project was later replicated in
Galveston Bay, Texas, and San Francisco Bay, California as a model of
environmental responsibility. Liveaboards researched and wrote the book
SOUNDWATCH: An Environmental Guide For Boaters, and helped the publisher,
48o North, distribute over 75,000 copies of the free guide.
Liveaboards also provide an essential service to the marinas leasing
the State tidelands. They provide the front line of protection in the
marinas. With millions of dollars of personal property floating
unprotected and unguarded in most marinas, liveaboards are the first line
of security. They deter intruders and report fires. They keep boats from
sinking, they note suspicious activities around the docks and they protect
boats, marinas and the water from winter storms.
The marine industry is big business in the State of Washington,
comparable to the acclaimed apple industry from the east side of the
Cascades. Selling boats to liveaboards is a significant percentage of the
business of all yacht brokers. One small brokerage house tallied the total
sales from 1999 and discovered that 25 percent of his boat sales were to
liveaboards. The sales to liveaboards generated over $66,000 in sales tax
to the State of Washington. And this is just the total for one small
company.
Liveaboards then rent slips, purchase equipment and gear, and support
local businesses. Liveaboards contribute millions and millions of dollars
to local and state economies. The popularity of boating in the Northwest
is reflected in the positive impact it has on the state's economy. Nearly
a thousand small companies making up the marine trade industry, generate
$2 billion for the state's economy annually, and offer close to twenty
thousand state residents ongoing good-paying employment opportunities. In
an industry made up of a lot of small businesses with small margins, DNR's
liveaboard policy will have a devastating impact throughout the marine
industry and on the industry's contribution to the state economy.
The immediate concern is where do these 30 families evicted from their
Lake Union boats now go? Moorage is already in short supply; most marinas
have no capacity to accommodate these displaced liveaboards. The longer
term question is, where do the 3,000 liveaboard families (according to the
statewide projects from the Washington Liveaboard Association) go if DNR
is successful in banning all liveaboards from Washington State? If
thousands of people were evicted from their homes so the State could turn
over the property to a private company to have a parking lot (in this
case, it's just a parking lot for boats), the public outrage would be
deafening in Olympia. As it should be now for the liveaboards.
DNR has stated it wants to evict thousands of people from their homes,
it threatens a long and cherished lifestyle in Western Washington, it
wants to make it more difficult for a marina owner to be able to meet the
terms of his lease, and the agency threatens a valuable state industry.
Since we can find no precedent in law, we can only assume that this action
against the liveaboard community is personal in nature. We shall encourage
our 200 association members, other marine-related organizations, the
entire marine industry and all boaters to support the efforts of the
liveaboards working to stop this unwarranted attack on a lifestyle. We
shall also encourage and participate in any political action against those
who support the continued implementation of this policy.
All of us with the NORTHWEST YACHT BROKERS ASSOCIATION look forward to
your immediate action on this issue.
Pat Jutte Jeffrey D.
Briggs
President Executive Director